Level is an important concept in entanglement theory. Beginners in entanglement theory are often confused by the level, and often do not know what level they are studying. The level mentioned in Zen in Zen is the trend type level of Zen in Zen, and the trend type level is determined by the central level that constitutes the trend type.
Before figuring out the level, we need to understand why we need to figure out the level. If you don't have the concept of level, what impact will it have on you. If you are given a k-line chart without time units marked, can you analyze it with levels? sure! You can define your own minimum level L0, for example, 3 consecutive overlapping K-lines constitute the lowest level center, on this basis you can recursively define L1 level, L2 level, L3 level..., this is also what the Zen master said, You can find the big top at the annual line level on the one-minute level chart. The reason why the big top of the year line level can be found is that the level of the year line can be recursively defined step by step from the 1 minute level. The relativity of the levels can be known from the recursive definition of the levels, with L0 as the initial level, and then the upper level is defined step by step. Therefore, understanding the relativity of levels is the key to mastering the levels of Chan Zhong Shuo. When we analyze the application, we also use a certain level as a benchmark to analyze and judge the trend of the upper level and the lower level. These are all relative to the level, and there is no need to know which level the absolute level is.
When we study Tanglun, we often adopt some simplified treatment conventions. For example, in the explanations of Tanglun by Du Yehua and Li Xiaojun, the center is simplified, which is commonly known as the pen center. In the original text of Zang Zhong Shuo Zen, the definition of the trend center is as follows: in a certain level of trend type, the part that is overlapped by at least three consecutive sub-level trend types is called the trend center of Zang Zhong Shuo Zen. Zang Zhong said that the trend center of Zen is composed of the overlapping parts of at least three consecutive sub-level trend types. In the simple theory, the definition of pen center is that the overlapping part of three consecutive pens in this level constitutes the center of this level. So, what is the relationship between pen, line segment and trend type? Roughly, a stroke at this level is approximately equal to a line segment at the secondary level; a line segment at the secondary level is approximately equal to a trend type at the secondary level; therefore, the pen center at this level can be roughly equal to the Zen trend center at this level Therefore, in terms of the level concept, the pen center and the center of the Zen movement in the Zen center are at the same level. I have been entangled in the pen center and the line segment center for a while. In fact, the daily line center is the daily line pen center, or the 30-minute line segment center, or the daily line trend center. These concepts are basically equal, that is, the daily line center ≈ Daily line pen center ≈ daily line trend type center ≈ 30-minute line segment center. In fact, in my understanding, Tanglun focuses on relative levels, not decisive levels. It is when the levels are combined to figure out the upper level, the previous level, the current level, the sub-level, and the sub-level. The relative relationship between them is enough. As for whether the level is 30-minute level or daily line level, it is just a name. You only need to understand that the sub-level of daily line level is 30-minute level, and the sub-level of daily line level is 5 minutes. level will do. As long as the centers of these levels you define are defined with a unified concept (that is, all use the pen center or all use the line segment center).
The above mentioned the concept of relative level, so what is absolute level, and what is the significance of the existence of absolute level?
The so-called absolute level refers to the level divided by a unified standard, that is, adopting a unified L0 center agreement, adopting a consistent center definition (pen center or line segment center), and defining large levels step by step according to the unified standard, then in The level concept obtained under such a unified standard is the absolute level. The existence of the absolute level is just like the function of the ISO standard. It can provide everyone with a unified context, make everyone communicate smoothly, and know what each other is talking about, so as to promote the exchange and development of technology and expand a wider range of applications. . However, even if there is no absolute standard, everyone works on their own and defines their own standards according to the same principles. They can still realize their own products and carry out their own work. There is no major obstacle to this. Only when everyone discusses, communicates with each other, and cooperates with each other, absolute standards can play their role. Otherwise, before communicating, you must first understand what the other party is talking about, and compare the concepts in the other party's system with the concepts in your own system. Correspond one by one. Therefore, when learning and using entanglement theory by yourself, it is the key to figure out what your relative level is. Only when exchanging ideas with friends and discussing technology, you need to pay attention to the absolute level: it is nothing more than unifying everyone to use the same initial level definition for the level definition. In the process of recursively defining the superior level, the center adopts a unified definition standard. In this way, there will be no obstacles for everyone to communicate and communicate, that's all.
I used to be confused about whether the center of a certain level I mentioned and the center of the same level mentioned by others are the same level of center. In fact, whether they are the same level of center has no effect on your analysis at all, just communicate with each other There may be some ambiguity, for example, you use the definition of the pen center, and he uses the definition of the line segment center. You talk about yours, and he talks about his. Be able to have a clear conversation, otherwise just switch the other party's level to your own level (the absolute level unification is just for the convenience of everyone's communication). But each analysis, you look at your sub-level, he sees his sub-level, it has no effect, everyone can get the correct analysis result (the relative level is the key to the analysis, the key is to define the center of each level to use consistent standard)
Zang Zhong said that the Zen master emphasized the concept of level, and it is only my personal understanding at present, mainly emphasizing the following three aspects:
1. Simultaneous analysis of each level, through the different positions of each level, has a clearer judgment on the current trend, which was expressed in the previous article.
2. Recognize your own operating level, and don't operate in confusion. For example, buy at a small-level buying point but expect a large-level selling point; intervene at a large-level buying point, but sell early at a small-level selling point. It should be noted that at what level of buying point to intervene, it is necessary to sell at what level of selling point. Of course, if you intervene at a large-level buying point, you can operate at a sub-level buying and selling point, thereby earning the price difference and improving efficiency. But pay attention to timely replenishment, otherwise it will lead to fewer and fewer stocks or higher costs. In this case, it is better not to operate, and honestly operate according to the large-scale trading points.
3. The most effective operation method: Decompose at the same level, only focus on the rise and fall of a specific level, and perform fluctuation operations during the rise and fall.
To sum up, the key to understanding the level of Chan Zhong said is to fully understand the relativity and absoluteness of levels: the distinction of relative levels is the key to analysis, and the key is to adopt consistent standards for the definition centers of each level; the absolute level is for It is convenient for everyone to communicate in a standardized unified context. The key is that everyone adopts a unified initial definition and a consistent central definition to define their own levels. I believe that after understanding these two points, you will no longer be confused about the level of Zen in the future.
Add
