"My own trading system is getting simpler and simpler", what the hell is this?

How simple can a trading system be?

It can be as simple as one point to open a position, one k to stop the loss, and when the k is broken, just leave, isn't it very simple? It's so simple that you can't believe it, but let me tell you that this is a positive (so-called "huge profit-loss ratio") system. The problem is that even if it looks simple, what is the real logic? Do you understand again?

The real simplicity is the simplicity after you have gone through the complexity, and when you have not even experienced the complexity, you say it is simple, it is not simple, it is the simplicity of your self-righteous cognitive definition, which may be a manifestation of ignorance in the eyes of others !

Let's explore the things behind these little by little. Behind everything simple, there must be logic, thinking, ideas, and then extended to behavior. As a result, this is a process. You will find that they are all based on logic, and everything must be It starts from logic.

But the root of logic is cognition. The closer your cognition of a thing is to the essence, then naturally your logic will change with your cognition, that is, it will gradually become: cognition, logic, thinking , concepts, methods . Every book you read is actually such a process. This process needs to be experienced, and it cannot be talk, let alone talk on paper.

The market is in motion. In the market movement, people must keep coming in, and then people keep going out. Finally, the power of capital can form a joint force under the fermentation of time.

This joint push will make the market move in one direction, and this process can be interrupted at any time, just like the bottom of w turns into the top of m when it goes down. Of course, this is just a small example.

But it can also show that it is difficult for you to use any theory to achieve sustained and stable profits. You will also believe that all theories are really just to sell you a book, but if you really look at the market carefully, you will also find that there is no profit in the market . There are some key points, which are forces belonging to different cycles .

You need to clearly know the level of performance it reflects, and clearly know whether you should participate? What kind of impact will such cyclical forces have on your operating cycle? Do you need to make an order? Does this list conform to its own underlying logic? So where is the spread? How big is the damage? How big is the profit?

And you also need to consider the "time" factor and in the face of an uncertain market, how should you use asset management and warehouse management for effective risk control? When the further movement of the market proves that you are right, then you have to consider, what is the market doing? How should you handle monads?

The whole transaction is probably such a psychological process. But in terms of behavior, you can only open a position and maintain a loss, or you don't open a position at all. There are only these actions, and then they are expressed on the k of the market mapping, waiting to open a position, waiting to close a position, nothing else.

Let’s go back to simplicity, the performance is nothing more than one point to open a position, one k to stop loss, but have you really understood the market and yourself, have you tried to integrate yourself with the market?

When you come here, you will naturally know that all theories are actually one, and all theories are the Bible. At this time, you only need to know that if this theory is good and which one is bad, they are all leeks, but the fat and thin are different!

In the same way, opening a position at this point can exist on the weekly line, daily line, hour, even minute, and second. Then, what level is the k for your corresponding cycle gain and loss?

At this time you discovered again, how to confirm this point? But still the above things, cycles, funds, but the performance is on the level, in fact, the simpler the things, the more difficult it is to understand, different cognition, different thinking, naturally there will be many, many ambiguities!

Going back to the question at the beginning, then it can be as simple as one point open, one k loss, and one point level!