Why is it so hard for an analyst to be the best trader?
What is the essential difference between a good analyst and a good trader?
There is a huge difference between a good analyst and a good trader. Many analysts analyze the market and talk about theories in a clear and logical way, with a high accuracy rate.But once on the battlefield, the real gold and silver were slaughtered in the market, and most of them returned in defeat. The truly powerful masters are consistent in analysis and transaction execution, which is what we often say is the unity of knowledge and action.To become an excellent trader who combines analysis and actual combat, obviously, this goal is not easy. This also confirms the reason why there are so many callers who are quite accurate when you look at them, but you will lose money if you follow them.[Image]Most theorists end up being a one-man, the kind who don't do it themselves.What do you think?
A handful of bitter tears, I have been trading for five years, and I still lose money, what should I do?
What do you think of the sentence "The initial trading habit of human beings is not trend trading, but buying bottoms and finding highs"?
"Buying the bottom and finding the high" and "following the trend" are two parallel trading ideas. In real life, 90% of people like to choose "buying the bottom and finding the high", and the remaining 10% have also undergone a lot of training and thinking. After correction, you will choose to "follow the trend". Why do we naturally like to "buy the bottom and touch the high"?
If you have a bad mentality, does this mean that you are not suitable for trading?