What is the essential difference between a good analyst and a good trader?
There is a huge difference between a good analyst and a good trader. Many analysts analyze the market and talk about theories in a clear and logical way, with a high accuracy rate.But once on the battlefield, the real gold and silver were slaughtered in the market, and most of them returned in defeat. The truly powerful masters are consistent in analysis and transaction execution, which is what we often say is the unity of knowledge and action.To become an excellent trader who combines analysis and actual combat, obviously, this goal is not easy. This also confirms the reason why there are so many callers who are quite accurate when you look at them, but you will lose money if you follow them.[Image]Most theorists end up being a one-man, the kind who don't do it themselves.What do you think?
How to distinguish between "noise" and "signal" in the trading field, and extract truly valuable information?
The financial market is flooded with a lot of information all the time, how can we extract something of real value from this information?
How to effectively find the entry point?
Since when did you feel that trading is not that complicated?
Let me talk about myself, when I came into contact with currency, I found it very simple. Isn’t it just buying and selling currency, and there is no time limit. Later, when I really started trading, especially when I came into contact with indicators, I found it very difficult. Some indicators even have names. I couldn’t read it well, and after I studied it thoroughly, I found that the market was not as docile as I imagined, and losses were common, and my mentality collapsed...Why do I think trading is from simple to difficult, but Isn't it getting simpler and simpler as everyone said? Do you feel the same way?
How to determine whether your trading style is short-term or long-term?