How do you view the theory that review is useless?
What is the essential difference between a good analyst and a good trader?
There is a huge difference between a good analyst and a good trader. Many analysts analyze the market and talk about theories in a clear and logical way, with a high accuracy rate.But once on the battlefield, the real gold and silver were slaughtered in the market, and most of them returned in defeat. The truly powerful masters are consistent in analysis and transaction execution, which is what we often say is the unity of knowledge and action.To become an excellent trader who combines analysis and actual combat, obviously, this goal is not easy. This also confirms the reason why there are so many callers who are quite accurate when you look at them, but you will lose money if you follow them.[Image]Most theorists end up being a one-man, the kind who don't do it themselves.What do you think?
Why gold has always been a top choice for investors
Firstly, gold is considered a safe haven asset, meaning it retains its value even during economic uncertainties. It has a long-standing reputation as a store of wealth, dating back thousands of years. Secondly, gold has a limited supply, making it a scarce resource. This scarcity gives it intrinsic value.
My usual trading system continues to fail, what should I do?
If a trading system built by myself often fails and causes losses, should I abandon this system and replace it with another one? Is there a stable and profitable trading system?
Which is of greater significance and simplicity for you: a High Risk-Reward Ratio (RR) or a High Win Rate?
For me, achieving a high Risk-Reward Ratio takes a considerable amount of time and necessitates a lot of patience. It's led to instances where I've experienced substantial losses. This has led me to contemplate whether lowering my RR might result in a significantly improved win rate. What's your experience with this? I'm curious to hear your thoughts.Looking forward to your responses! 🙏🏼