What is the essential difference between a good analyst and a good trader?
There is a huge difference between a good analyst and a good trader. Many analysts analyze the market and talk about theories in a clear and logical way, with a high accuracy rate.But once on the battlefield, the real gold and silver were slaughtered in the market, and most of them returned in defeat. The truly powerful masters are consistent in analysis and transaction execution, which is what we often say is the unity of knowledge and action.To become an excellent trader who combines analysis and actual combat, obviously, this goal is not easy. This also confirms the reason why there are so many callers who are quite accurate when you look at them, but you will lose money if you follow them.[Image]Most theorists end up being a one-man, the kind who don't do it themselves.What do you think?
What is your basis for entering the market?
Winning ratio and profit-loss ratio, which one do you value more?
How to understand the phrase "the simpler the trading system, the better"?
What is the degree of simplicity here? Or the simplicity here is not what I thought, just use a few indicators, so what do you think of this sentence?
What do you think are the core competitiveness of a good broker?