What is the essential difference between a good analyst and a good trader?
There is a huge difference between a good analyst and a good trader. Many analysts analyze the market and talk about theories in a clear and logical way, with a high accuracy rate.But once on the battlefield, the real gold and silver were slaughtered in the market, and most of them returned in defeat. The truly powerful masters are consistent in analysis and transaction execution, which is what we often say is the unity of knowledge and action.To become an excellent trader who combines analysis and actual combat, obviously, this goal is not easy. This also confirms the reason why there are so many callers who are quite accurate when you look at them, but you will lose money if you follow them.[Image]Most theorists end up being a one-man, the kind who don't do it themselves.What do you think?
Can retail investors make money by imitating the single-handling methods of large institutions?
I found that our retail investors like to fight against big institutions when doing transactions. Why is this? Since it is a large institution, it is generally profitable, so can we still make money by imitating their single-handling methods?Recently, I heard about an institutional order area strategy. As long as you have the ability to identify and discover the order area of an institution, by identifying the trading methods of banks and large institutions, you can follow their footsteps to make money. It sounds reasonable, do you think it is reliable?
What do you think are the core competitiveness of a good broker?
If you have a bad mentality, does this mean that you are not suitable for trading?
Why is it so hard for an analyst to be the best trader?