What is the essential difference between a good analyst and a good trader?
There is a huge difference between a good analyst and a good trader. Many analysts analyze the market and talk about theories in a clear and logical way, with a high accuracy rate.But once on the battlefield, the real gold and silver were slaughtered in the market, and most of them returned in defeat. The truly powerful masters are consistent in analysis and transaction execution, which is what we often say is the unity of knowledge and action.To become an excellent trader who combines analysis and actual combat, obviously, this goal is not easy. This also confirms the reason why there are so many callers who are quite accurate when you look at them, but you will lose money if you follow them.[Image]Most theorists end up being a one-man, the kind who don't do it themselves.What do you think?
Why can you see the general direction right, but make a bad point in the transaction, and lose money instead?
How to distinguish between "noise" and "signal" in the trading field, and extract truly valuable information?
The financial market is flooded with a lot of information all the time, how can we extract something of real value from this information?
Do you think EA will be a market trend?
What are the common operating modes of thousands of trading studios, and how do they support themselves?
I partnered with a friend to do asset management for a year, and then it all collapsed. Is there any colleague to share with you? I also want to try again, before I try, I would like to ask everyone's suggestions and experiences